Jonathan Nwokpor
Keep up with latest news and be part of our weekly giveaways and airtime sharing, follow our WhatsApp channel for more update. Click to Follow us
President Bola Tinubu was advised on Saturday by Aloy Ejimakor, the lead counsel to Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, or IPOB, not to defame the United Nations, as former President Muhammadu Buhari had done.
Ejimakor described how, in July 2022, the UN Rights Council Working Group ordered Buhari’s administration to free Kanu and provide him with compensation.
He revealed that Tinubu must free Kanu since his case has progressed from a legal to a political one.
In a statement he signed, Ejimakor said: “In July 2022, the United Nations Human Rights Council (through a landmark Opinion issued by its Working Group) directed the Buhari-led Government of Nigeria to free Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and accord him a pathway to compensation for his infamous extraordinary rendition from Kenya to Nigeria in June 2021.
“The 17-page Opinion, in its Disposition (or conclusion) states that: “The Working Group considers that, taking into account all the circumstances of the case, the appropriate remedy would be for the Government of Nigeria to release Mr Kanu immediately and accord him an enforceable right to compensation and other reparations, in accordance with international law.”
“As a background, the Working Group of the United Nations Human Rights Council is a quasi-judicial body that has the legal mandate of the United Nations to receive and adjudicate human rights petitions against member nations of the UN. Accordingly, its Decisions (diplomatically called Opinions) are legally binding on all member nations of the United Nations, including Nigeria.
“In addition to Nigeria being a bonafide member of the United Nations, this very UN decision on Mazi Kanu is primarily predicated on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, by which Nigeria is legally bound by virtue of its ratification by an Act of the National Assembly under Section 12 of the Nigerian Constitution.
“To be sure, ratification is a means by which a nation makes itself subject to international laws and treaties. And by the provisions of Section 12 of the Nigerian Constitution and a plethora of decisions by the Supreme Court of Nigeria and international tribunals with jurisdiction, ratification makes every ratifying nation (including Nigeria) subject to whatever it ratified. This is non-arguable and inviolable.
“It goes without saying, therefore that, as a bonafide member of the United Nations and a treaty-bound nation, Nigeria is subject to decisions issuing from the United Nations. Thus, Nigeria is duty-bound to implement this decision in its black letters and spirit. And it was expected to do so promptly.
“The advance copy of the Opinion which was issued on 20th July 2022 was released to me on 23rd July 2022. The cover letter bearing the Opinion indicated that the Working Group forwarded the Opinion to the Government of Nigeria a day earlier on 22nd July, 2022; yet former President Buhari failed to comply until he left office.
“Nonetheless, it is never too late to act, even as Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has, for three and half years, endured the horrendous rigours of detention that is bereft of any legal justification.
“Therefore, unlike a misguided Buhari, a wiser President Tinubu can do the right thing by freeing Mazi Nnamdi Kanu without further ado. He does not need any court order to do so because the matter has transformed from the legal or judicial to the political. And as the saying goes, the buck stops at the President’s table.”
Please don’t forget to “Allow the notification” so you will be the first to get our gist when we publish it.
Drop your comment in the section below, and don’t forget to share the post.
