Keep up with the latest news and be part of our weekly giveaways and airtime sharing; follow our WhatsApp channel for more updates. Click to Follow us

The Nigerian government’s attempt to schedule the start of Nnamdi Kanu’s trial has been rejected by the principal attorney for the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, leader.

On September 24, 2024, Justice Binta Nyako of the Abuja Federal High Court entered and enrolled an order recusing herself from Kanu’s trial, which served as the basis for Ejimakor’s denial.

Remember that Kanu had expressed dissatisfaction with Justice Nyako’s handling of the case and asked her to recuse herself from his trial.

The judge granted Kanu’s plea and gave his case file over to Justice John Tsoho, the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court.

But in order to continue the trial, Justice Tsoho returned the case file to Justice Nyako.

In spite of this, Adegboyega Awomolo, the Nigerian government’s prosecuting attorney, asked for a date to extend Kanu’s trial.

On December 5, 2024, Awomolo wrote the following letter to the Federal High Court’s Deputy Chief Registrar: “We write as prosecuting counsel in the above-named criminal case pending before the Federal High Court, No. 2.

“Your record will reveal that the defendant asked His Lordship, the Honourable Justice Binta Nyako, to recuse herself on Tuesday, 24th September 2024. The case file was returned to the Honourable Chief Judge.

“We were informed that the Hon. Chief Judge had returned the case file for the continuation of trial before His Lordship, the Honourable Justice Binta Nyako.

“Grateful, may we ask for a date for the continuation of hearing of the criminal charges against the defendant.

“Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.”

Rejecting Awomolo’s request, Ejimakor stated that the move was “fatally misconceived” and, if not checked, could mislead Justice Nyako into a path of “infamy and unconstitutionality.”

Ejimakor, in a counter-letter to the Deputy Chief Registrar wrote: “This communication pertains to the attached letter by the complainant requesting ‘a date for continuation of hearing of the criminal charges against the defendant.’

“By this communication, we wish to go on record to inform your good offices that the defendant takes serious exception to the said letter and hereby vigorously objects to the request by the complainant for a date for the continuation of hearing of this criminal case before His Lordship, Hon. Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako.

“Our position is predicated on the fact of record that His Lordship (Hon. Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako) had entered and enrolled an order recusing herself from handling the case or continuing with the trial.

“The said order was entered on 24th September 2024 and, to date, remains extant and subsisting, as it has not been set aside by a subsequent order made by a competent court, pursuant to a competent process on notice.

“Accordingly, we believe that the complainant’s request is fatally misconceived and, if not checked, may mislead this Honourable Court to a path of infamy and unconstitutionality.

“For the avoidance of doubt, as of 24th September 2024, the defendant no longer has any such case to answer before His Lordship, Hon. Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako.”

Since his re-arrest in Kenya in June 2021 and subsequent extraordinary rendition to Nigeria, Kanu has remained behind bars.

The Court of Appeal cleared Kanu of all charges after he returned to Nigeria, but the Nigerian government has not allowed him to leave.

The Supreme Court heard arguments on the case and, in December 2023, ruled that Kanu’s case be sent back to the Abuja Federal High Court for a new trial.

Please don’t forget to “Allow the notification” so you will be the first to get our gist when we publish it. 
Drop your comment in the section below, and don’t forget to share the post.