Nigerian govt out to silence opposition with cybercrime law — Lawyer

Keep up with the latest news and be part of our weekly giveaways and airtime sharing; follow our WhatsApp channel for more updates. Click to Follow us

Public affairs analyst, Justice Osai Ahiakwo, has criticized the recently enacted bill signed by President Bola Tinubu, claiming it was crafted by the federal government with the intent to suppress dissenting voices.

In a statement released in Calabar on Thursday evening, Ahiakwo, who is also a legal practitioner, argued that the newly signed Cybercrimes Act 2025 undermines the fundamental right to access information.

He noted that the Freedom of Information Act, introduced in 2011, was designed with citizens in mind and reflected the government’s commitment at the time to uphold democratic values.

However, Ahiakwo contended that the updated Cybercrimes legislation appears to be structured in a way that indirectly penalizes individuals for expressing public opinions.

He further stated that the law imposes tougher controls on digital spaces, introducing provisions that limit the freedom of social media users, including content creators and those who engage in online discussions.

“The 2025 Act heightens unauthorized access to devices, tampering with data, disclosure of critical information, recording of private conversations, spreading of fake news, online harassment and abuse, inciting ethnic or religious hatred are all criminalized to attract various prescribed jail terms.”

Ahiakwo fears that the authorities may force technological companies to hand over user data without transparency safeguards, just to punish perceived enemies.

“The implementation of this law may not guarantee individual rights to freedom of information as the drafters of the law had in mind.”

Ahiakwo expressed worry that the new law conflicts with the Freedom of Information Act.

“Between the above-cited law and the Freedom of Information Act, 2011, which establishes a legal right for citizens to access information held by public institutions and certain private entities, lies the thrust of the matter.

“Can anyone who is allegedly held for violating the Cybercrimes Act, 2025, rely on the Freedom of Information Act, 2011?

For further information on sport secret and greatest sport icon click here

“This remains an issue to be resolved by the Court of Law saddled with the jurisdiction to entertain such a case.

“The Freedom of Information Act, 2011 seeks to promote transparency and accountability by making public records and information more freely available and accessible.”

Please don’t forget to “Allow the notification” so you will be the first to get our gist when we publish it. 
Drop your comment in the section below, and don’t forget to share the post