Keep up with the latest news and be part of our weekly giveaways and airtime sharing; follow our WhatsApp channel for more updates. Click to Follow us

Mike Arnold, a former mayor of Blanco City in Texas, USA, has asserted that the British government is against the emergence of an independent Republic of Biafra because it wishes to avoid reparations estimated at around $6 trillion owed to ‘Biafrans’.

Arnold, recognized for his sympathetic stance towards the Biafra struggle, made the assertion in a post titled ‘Britain’s bill is due’ on his verified Facebook page.

He stated that an independent Biafra could request Britain to pay the amount. He claims that this sum, equivalent to two times the yearly GDP of Britain, will constitute the largest reparation claim ever made.

Arnold characterized the actions of the British against the people of Nigeria’s South-East as a “vast, horrific, ongoing evil” and linked what he deemed Britain’s crime against the Igbos to the 1914 amalgamation of the northern and southern protectorates.

Parts of the post read, “In 1914, Lord Lugard drew a line around two incompatible civilizations — the Islamic Caliphate of the North and the Christian and traditional peoples of the South — called it Nigeria, and handed it to the Crown. Nobody was asked. The contraption was designed from birth to keep the Caliphate in administrative control and the oil flowing to London.

“When the Southeast tried to leave in 1967 — after tens of thousands of Igbos were slaughtered in northern pogroms — Britain showed its hand. Their own declassified Foreign Office documents state it plainly: “The sole immediate British interest in Nigeria is that the Nigerian economy should be brought back to a condition in which our substantial trade and investment in the country can be further developed, and particularly so we can regain access to important oil installations.”

Arnold added, “So Harold Wilson’s Labour government secretly armed the Nigerian federal military. Millions of rounds of ammunition. Hundreds of machine guns. Thousands of mortar and artillery bombs. Aircraft. Armored personnel carriers. While standing in Parliament and lying about it.

“Nigeria imposed a blockade on Biafra. Food couldn’t get in. Medicine couldn’t get in. The famine was not an accident. It was the strategy. When parliamentarians begged Wilson to stop — estimating two million deaths from starvation — he rebuffed them.

“Two days later he secretly agreed to supply Nigeria with aircraft for the first time. When images of skeletal Biafran children shocked the world, Wilson called it “propaganda.” Up to three million people died. Most of them children.

“Britain pocketed the oil. They have never apologized. Never acknowledged it in a school textbook. Never paid a single penny.”

Arnold proceeded to detail how Britain accumulated a $6 trillion debt to the ‘people of Biafra’, which, in his view, an independent Biafra nation could claim from the British government as reparations.

Explaining that the $6 trillion was arrived at after “a calculation built category by category from documented facts”, he stated, “Oil Revenue — Biafran Territory: Nigeria has earned approximately $600 billion in oil revenue since the 1960s. Two thirds of Shell-BP’s operations were in Biafran territory. At a 60% territorial share — $360 billion. Adjusted for inflation from 1967 dollars to today — conservatively $2.5 trillion.

“Wrongful Death — Up to 3 Million People: International wrongful death precedents — Holocaust reparations, ICC awards, comparable genocide settlements — range from $100,000 to $500,000 per life. At a conservative $500,000 per person — $1.5 trillion.

“Structural Damages — 112 Years of the Contraption: The 1914 amalgamation. The installation of the Caliphate as the administrative class. The 1960 handover engineered to protect British commercial dominance. The ongoing genocide that architecture enables to this day. Caribbean nations are currently pursuing $10 trillion from Britain for slavery reparations. Nigeria’s case is more recent, more direct, and more documentable. Conservative estimate — $1 trillion.

“Obstruction of humanitarian aid. Arms supply to an aggressor. Compounding interest on all of the above — add $500 billion minimum.

“The Total: Approximately $6 trillion. Twice Britain’s annual GDP. The largest reparations claim in human history. Every penny of it sourced from declassified British government documents. Harold Wilson’s own words. Shell-BP’s own records. The Foreign Office’s own confessions.

“A free Biafra — or any legitimate successor government representing the Southeast — would have full legal standing to file this claim before the International Court of Justice. Which is exactly why the British don’t want anyone talking about Biafra.”

Arnold’s views align with the assertions of pro-Igbo self-determination groups such as American Veterans of Igbo Descent (AVID), Ambassadors for Self-Determination, and Rising Sun Foundation, which argue that Britain’s desire to prevent the breakup of Nigeria is why it did not intervene in the case of Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), who is also a British citizen.

Shortly after the IPOB leader was found guilty of terrorism and received a life sentence, the American Veterans of Igbo Descent—an organization comprising both active and retired U.S. military personnel of Igbo heritage—accused the British government of facilitating the ‘persecution’ of its citizen Kanu by the Nigerian authorities.

Please don’t forget to “Allow the notification” so you will be the first to get our gist when we publish it. 
Drop your comment in the section below, and don’t forget to share the post.